Srimathi Radharani

Updated on March 24, 2019 in Goddess
9 on August 22, 2018

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namah! Sri Sriranga Narayana Jeeyar Swamigale Saranam!

Dear Velukkudi Swami,

Dansyosmi! Adiyenin Aneka Koti Namaskaram! 

For the last couple of days, adiyen have been wanting to learn about the scriptural references (Bhagavatham / Divya Prabhandam) about Srimathi Radharani. Unfortunately, as Swami mentioned in the link

that there are no scriptural references about Srimathi Radharani in any of these above-mentioned scriptures and Swami had mentioned that she is the personification of Bhakti. Adiyen not sure if somewhere there was a mention of Srimathi Radharani as an incarnation of Nila Devi / Nappinai. Please forgive and correct me if that is not correct. 

My humble and sincere request, adiyen would like to hear more in detail about Srimathi Radharani from devareer’s voice through enpani / any other medium.  

adiyen will pray to Sri Ranganathar that this request is addressed soon! 

Adiyen,

Badrinarayana Ramanuja Dasan!

 
  • Liked by
  • VisishtadvaitaVedanta
Reply

Sri Velukkudi Swamigal Thiruvadigale Saranam?

As Swamy knows, coming 17th is Radhastami. Adiyen will be blessed if Swamy choose to use this day’s Enpani to answer adiyen’s request?

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel

சுவாமியின் கருனை இந்த அடியேனின் கோரிக்கை மீது படும் நாள் எப்போதோ? வேண்டி காத்து இருபேன்!

அடியேன் ராமானுஜ தாசன்?

Swami, 

Adiyen enjoyed Swami’s beautiful mention about Smt. Radharani in devareer’s “Perfect questions Perfect Answers English Boston” lecture (time 47 mins)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/hgqu53c33ynmjxn/Perfect%20Questions%20%26%20Perfect%20Answers_Eng.mp3?dl=0 

Adiyen,

Ramanuja Dasan

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on October 16, 2018

Sri Ramanuja Munaye Namaha,

Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami Guruve Namaha,

 

Dear BhagavAta,

 

Honestly, adiyen believe Swami Answers some questions ‘Implicitly‘ referring to the question, and Swami Answers some questions ‘Explicitly‘ by NOT referring to the question, but still Swami answers.

 

So, adiyen believe Swami has already answered ‘Explicitly’ in the very next day Enpani 1118 on 23-Aug-18 after Bhagavata posted the question on 22-Aug-18 without referring to the question.

 

The reason why adiyen say Swami has ‘Explicitly’ answered is because, Swami’s answer on Enpani 1118, matches Bhagavatas Question plus matches Swami’s audio on SriRadha that Bhagavata has posted along with the question.

 

Here is how it is:

Bhagavata in the above thread already said that “adiyen have been wanting to learn about scriptural references (Bhagavtam/Divya Pradhandham) about Srimathi Radharani. Unfortunately, as Swami mentioned in the link that there are no scriptural references about Srimathi Radharani in any of these above mentioned scriptures

So, when Bhagavatas question already has answer that there is no scriptural reference, but still Bhagavta has continued again as ” My humble and sincere request, adiyen would like to hear more in deatil about Srimathi Radharani from devareer’s voice.”

So, adiyen feel, when Swami already says there is no scriptural reference, how could Swami be able to explain more in detail about Srimathi Radharani.

 

Hence, adiyen feel Swami has ‘Explicitly’ answered in the next day Enpani 1118 “Paanai Sottrukku Oru Soru Padham”

Swami says in Enpani 1118 as, “We follow many things/rituals/pazhakka vazhakkangal since Mahans has said about it from period to period in the past. Then further, if we need to understand more detail of what they said inorder for us to follow it properly, then those can be explained within a LIMITED BOUNDARY only. If Mahans explain to in detail, or if Mahans DON’t explain it in deatil, then are we ina postion to accept those answers. We should look all the things that Mahans have said and we accept and follow it. So, if Mahans are not saying anything on few things/questions, then there are reasons for it, and we should also accept the answer that “Mahans didnot want to talk about it in detail. If Mahans few answers are convincing, then other answers also should be accepted without further questions“.

 

 

That’s why adiyen feel, Swami has explicitly asnwered to Bhagavtas question by NOT referring to the question directly, since Swami has already said the above Youtube link that “there are no scriptural evidences for Srimathi RadhaRani, then that itself is the answer to the question, and how could it be possible to explain in detail, when is no scriptural evidence.

 

Kindly, please listen to the Enpani 1118 over and over again to understand Swami’s ThiruUllam.

 

Sri Velukkudi Swami,

Since Bhagavata was repeatedly asking the same question, Adiyen felt, it will be unfair if adiyen don’t reflect adiyens understanding on what devareer has said in Enpaini 1118 that devareer has already answered it explicitly. Otherwise, Bhagavatas inner mind will keep pondering around the same question.”

 

Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami to forgive adiyen for explaining it in detail.

 

Adiyen Sri Velukkudi Krishna Dasan,

Uyya Oraey vazhi UdayavAr ThiruvAdi,

Sarvam SriKrishnarpanam Asthu

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on October 18, 2018

Sri Ramanuja Munaye Namaha,
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami Guruvae Namaha,

Dear Badrnarayana BhagavAta,

Swami has said Srimathi Radharani is “Personification of Bhakthi” in the about youtube link, which APTLY matches what north Indian great poets/gurus like Chaitanyacharyar has explained based on:

*******************************
Srimad Bhagavatam 10.30.28

anayaradhito nunam
bhagavan harir isvarah
yan no vihaya govindah
prito yam anayad rahah

anaya — by Her; aradhitah — perfectly worshiped;

The name Rādhā is derived from this verse, from the words anayārādhitaḥ, meaning “by Her the BhagavAn SriKrishna is worshiped.”

The name “Rādhā” is derived from the root word āRādhana, which means “worship.” The personality who excels all in worshiping Kṛṣṇa may therefore be called Rādhikā (feminine gender) , the greatest servitor.
************************

Since Veda Vyasar has not mentioned about Radha character in Mahabharatam, Srimadh Bhagavatam and Vishnu Puranam, we should consider the REAL meaning of Radha as:

“anyone who perfectly workships BhagavAvan SriKrishna can be called as Radhika or Radha, which is nothing but the “Personification of Bhakthi” or a “Pure state of Bhakthi” So each one of us should reach to that pure State of Bhakthi, which is nothing but the meaning of Radha (derived from aRadhadhito as in the verse). Therefore, each Acharyas(poets) primarily in north side developed the character using the same Name ‘Radha’ in their granthams that they wrote, inorder to APPLY the Real meaning of the verse aRadhitah , so we Bhaktas could do the ‘Pure Bhakthi’ to SriKrishna BhagavAn.

Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami’s Thunaiviyar (wife) real name is Radha maami and maami is pure worshipper of Sri Velukkudi Swami considering in both ways, either the meaning of the word aRadhana or in real sense.

Adiyen Sri Velukkudi Krishna Dasan,

Sri Radha Maami Samedha Sri Velukkudi Swami Ki Jai,

Uyya Oraey Vazhi UdayavAr ThiruvAdi,

Sri Rukmini Thayar Samedha SriKrishna BhagavAn Ki Jai,

Sarvam SriKrishnarpanam Asthu

on October 22, 2018

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namah! Sri Sriranga Narayana Jeeyar Swamigale Saranam!

Thank you Swami for the detailed explanation! 

Velukkudi Swami, please forgive this ignorant and unintelligent dasan in not understanding your words.

Velukkudi Swamigal Thiruvadigale saranam! 

Adiyen,

Badrinarayana Ramanuja Dasan! 

 

 

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
1 on October 23, 2018

Sri Ramanuja Munaye Namaha,
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami Guruvae Namaha,

Dear BhagavAta,

Namma Yellarum oraey ThiruvAdi dhaan “Swami Ramanujar ThiruvAdi” through our own Asmadh Acharyan ThiruvAdi via Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami ThiruvAdi.

If bhagavata start feeling as ‘ignorant and unintelligent dasan’, then it will make it appear that the ignorance and unintelligwnce is transferred from Swami’s ThiruvAdi to us, which cannot be true, since all SATH Vishayam is transferred to us via Swami’s ThiruvAdi.

So what Bhagavata should feel about it is ” like how our body is made up of EACH cells and each cells function differently in different organs, but EACH cells functions are important in “COALITION” for a COMMON GOAL which is nothing but to “Maintain Healthy body”.

Same way, all Ramanuja Dasas (all of us) are (dhulis/dust like the cells), and EQUALLY same, since we are in the Stick under the Same ThiruvAdi, and has ‘different functions’ (nothing but different kainkaryams like one asks, one explains etc…..), but primary Common goal is Swami Ramanujar’s “ThiruMugha Malartthi”(which is nothing but the Healthy body).

Bhagavata is one of the dust in Swami’s lotus feet and adiyen or other bhagavatas are different dusts in Swami’s lotus feet. So, Bhagavata asked question as a Kainkaryam this time, adiyen explained from Swami’s Pravachanams as Kainjaryam. Another time adiyen’s function (kainkaryam) could be different, adiyen will ask, then other Bhagavatas can explain referring to Swami’s pravachanams as kainkaryam, but the common goal is Swami’s Mugha Malartthi.

Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami’s Abhimaanamey Uddharakam (Mokshsm) for all the members inside and outside thus enpani and forum.

Adiyen Sri Velukkudi Krishna Dasan,
Uyya Oraey Vazhi UdayavAr ThiruvAdi,
Sarvam SriKrisha Kudumbham.

on November 2, 2018

Swami, 

I totally agree with you that we are part and parcels of Emperumanaar. 

But no offense, if

1. Andaal says “அறிவொன்று மில்லாத ஆய்குலத்து”

2. Nammalvaar says “அலகில் பொலிந்த அறிவிலேனுக் கருளாயே” and “அறிவிலேனுக் கருளாய் அறிவாருயிரானாய்” in 9th Centum

3. Thirumangaialvaar says “பேசினேன் ஏச மாட்டேன் பேதையேன் பிறவி நீத்தற்கு,” in Thirukurunthandakam

4. Thondaradipodialvaar says “விரும்பி நின்றேத்த மாட்டேன் விதியிலேன் மதியொன் றில்லை

If our Alvaars and purvacharyars claim that they are “Ignorant and Unintelligent”, than who are we. But I truly agree that Emperumanaar through his grace and using asmad Acaharyan and Sri Velukkudi Swami will certainly deliver us one day and we can truly say 

தெரிவுற்ற ஞானம் செறியப் பெறாது,வெந் தீவினையால்

உருவற்ற ஞானத் துழல்கின்ற என்னை, ஒருபொழுதில்

பொருவற்ற கேள்விய னாக்கிநின் றானென்ன புண்ணீயனோ!

தெரிவுற்ற கீர்த்தி, இராமா னுசனென்னும் சீர்முகிலே.

Adiyen,

Dasanu Dasan! 

Show more replies
  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
0 on November 2, 2018

Sri Ramanuja Munaye Namaha,
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami Gurube Namaha,

Arumaiyaana references BhagavAta. Quoting such HIGH ESTEEM references cannot be done one who is “ignorant and unintelligent”. This itself PROVES that these knowledge that BhagavAta has acquired is transferred from Swami Ramanujar’s ThiruvAdi through BhagavAtas Asmadh Acharyan ThiruvAdi with Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swami’s Anugraham and Abhimaanam. If we are ignorant/unintelligent/no grattitude, then BhagavAta couldn’t have told such Respectable quotations of Alwars/Acharyas.

So BhagavAta’s ThiruvAdikku Pallaandu due to BhagavAtas Guru-Bhakthi.

That’s why adiyen earlier said “all SATH Vishayam is transferred to us via Swami’s ThiruvAdi and ignorance/unintelligence is not transferred”. We are only Swami’s SrirPadha Dhuli’s (a tool/karuvi) executing Acharya Niyamanam as Kainkaryam aND that jainkaryams can vare from person to person. We always live with KRITHAKGYATHA(Grattitude) towards Swami’s ThiruvAdi.

Adiyen tried to inform the same to all BhagavAta’s in another thread about “GURU -BHAKTHI” as in below link, though the subject appears about memory increase, it’s actually all about Guru-Bhakthi.
Adiyen’s favourite is A2,B1,B2,B3,B4. In order to achieve these, C1 is what adiyen follow.

Adiyaargal Vaazha Aranga nagar Vaazha, Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamiye Innum Oru Noottraandu Irumm.

Adiyen Sri Velukkudi Krishna Dasan,
Uyya Oraey Vazhi UdayavAr ThiruvAdi,
Sarvam SriKrishna Kudumbham.

How to increase memory power for Spiritual Progress (Adiyens’ Notes from Swami’s audios)

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
Loading more replies