I am sure during Swamy Periya VachAn pillai times periyavAs branded vyAkhyAnams as Swakalpitham

Updated on August 28, 2022 in Azhwars
0 on August 28, 2022

Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam

During olden days, books cannot be easily written. It requires divine intervention.

Kamba Ramayanam an example where it required Narasimha’s acceptance.

Valmiki Ramayana required Brahma’s acceptance.

Every periyava of any times would have strict adherence principle of lineage.

That being the case, Swamy Periya VAchAn pillai who did 4000+ pasuram vyAkhyAnams of Azhwar Hrudhayam must have had objections those times.

Today we easily sideline his vamsam meaning those days we would have treated him the same.

I am not generalizing too much but by applying logic we Sri Vaishnavite tend to term other’s visions as “SwaKalpitham”.

Of course we have had many bhakthas singing praises of many Perumal after Azhwars.

Some illiterate bhakthas have had divine intervention and sang song on Narasimha.

Are we going to disrespect them? Do we have guts to say Narasimha sothrams as “Swakalpitham”. Are we going to accept them?

Avar avar vidhi vazhi Adai nindranarey

That’s all our perception should be.

Ava EdhO pannitu pora nu vitudanum

Many Sri Vaishnavite AchAryAs quote Kalidasa

Is it just because it is in Sanskrit?
Or it just has sringaara rasam?

If Kavyam has enough energy it is going to propel itself.

We just need to witness it.

Athrupthasya munim vandEy

Valmiki technically was “unhappy” while starting Ramayanam may be that’s the reason we never study uttara Ramayanam.

We are wired to like only “happiness”


  • Liked by