Scientific significance of pranayama proven

Updated on January 31, 2019 in General
1 on January 30, 2019
 
  • Liked by
Reply
0 on January 31, 2019

The paper “recognizes” Pranayama to be Chinese, Greek and also Hindu origin.

It does not acknowledge pranayama as EXCLUSIVELY Sanathani in origin, which as a fact it is. 

Also note the paper emphasizes only on Puraka (inhaling breath ) and Richaka (exhaling breath). It misses out Kumbaka (holding breath). This omission is (think) on purpose so any direct relation to this widespread Sanathani practice can be denied later by that Scientist. 

No Western institution especially Ivy League will ever agree on any positive contribution by Sanathana Dharma. 

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
Loading more replies