Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Reference to Perumai in Veda made as Sath.
Sath also refers to chith adiyen beleive
(Sath + Chith + Anandam).
Perumai is also known as Shuddha Sathvam.
Brughu maharishi and co went in search of Saathveeka God.
While Krishna asking us to leave all sAmAnya Dharma including Sathvam (& Rajas + Tamas) for Moksham.
If Sathvam is good, why that is being discarded for Moksham?
Secondly we are Mishra Sathvam. So removing, Raja + Tamo guNa will lead to better Sathvam correct? Is it not fully possible in this humanly state?
Also word Saathveekam originated from Perumal being Sath?
Or what is the relevance between Sath & Saathveekam?
Why Brahmin is supposed to be SAthvik?