adiyen discussed about ParaBramham and Lord Narayanan in other thread. Swamy responded that “There are many verses in Vedanta which mention Narayana as ParaBrahmam”.
adiyen understand that ParaBramham and Lord Narayanan are used synonymously in the scriptures. adiyen glanced SriBhashyam, wherein they are mentioned reciprocally. SriBhashyam gives logical details and discussion to prove several aspects including ParaBrahmam. I did not check in Vedanta / Upanishads. Is there any similar logical discussion, as in SriBhashyam, mentioned in Vedanta / Upanishads / or other scriptures to conclude Lord Narayana as ParaBramham. I would like to know the details considered to mention Lord Narayana as ParaBramham in the Vedanta or other scriptures. Preferably, if it is indicated with reference, it will be helpful for adiyen to understand in a better manner.