Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
Sri:
Adiyen was listening to one Advaiti Swamy of Sanskrit College upanyasam on LokAnthara Jeevan Subject
If Para lokam itself is vyAvahArika Sathyam why that differentiation of iham & Param in first place Swamy?
Dasanudasan
Imam maanava aavartham naavarthanthey
Therefore
“Imam” according Bhasyakarar means
The athma will get birth in next Kalpa
That overrides
Na cha punar avarthathey
Of Brahmalokam that can be classified as SriVaikuntam!?
What is our Sri BhasyakArar’s interpretation on
“Imam”
Swamy?
Adiyen know it’s not correct to ask from someone’s upanyasam but as it is Veda it should be common for all of us
Also that Swamy says
Those who go by Karma moksham does not come back
Others have chances of coming back?
Dasanudasan
Errata: Karma Moksham to be read as Krama Moksham
Auto correct issue
Aa Bhrama BhuvanAth lokA: punarAvarthinOrjunA
Endru Gitayil Solli irukkAmey Kambandasan Swamy
Gita specialist please tell me the correct meaning?
Does this mean Krishna says we are coming back? On the premise Brahma lokam = Sri Vaikuntham
Dasanudasan
