Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
If someone asks controversial question on Veda will he be classified as:
Veda Bahyar? Or Veda Kudrishti?
If so, how Sadas are happening on Vedas? The meaning should be same & straightforward right?
What’s a point of a third perception & argument?
We know Udayavar’s erstwhile Guru made an incorrect interpretation with reference to Monkey’s prishta bhagam something about kapi I beleive on rose colour. His intention may be wrong but there is a possibility of different interpretation right? His Guru might have taught him may be with vengeance on Vishnu. Later we understand that Udayavar’s Guru himself became Sishya of Sri Ramanujar.
Same like Vadam & Vithanda Vadam
How do we classify Vadam between Vithanda Vadam when each is trying to prove a point based on some logic?
Someone asked a question on meat eating in Srimad Ramayana
Immediately adiyen saw a response as Veda Bahyar, Veda Kudrishti as expected!
Then how do we learn?
Its like saying “First accept what I say then ask based on it”
If a question is in alignment with everything then whats the point in asking? Its better to accept & not ask anything correct?
Swamy please clarify if this question made any sense
My colleague saying I am trying to prove what I learnt on God so I cannot come out of it, it seems!