Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha
Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha
Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam
ஆண்டாள் கூட வந்தவா ஏன் அயிக்கியம் ஆக வில்லை?
adiyen have been using chatgpt from openai. It’s so interesting when adiyen entered this question and got the following answer. These kinds of technologies are certainly not a replacement for our purvacharyas and living acharyas like our Swami. But aren’t we getting into the next level in technology?
Question asked to the tool:
why did people who came with andaal to srirangam didn’t get liberation when she got?
Generated Answer by the tool:
Andal is a female saint and poet of the Sri Vaishnavism tradition of Hinduism, who is believed to have lived in the 8th century AD. She is known for her devotional poetry in Tamil language, which expresses her love and devotion to Lord Vishnu. According to legend, Andal had a vision of Lord Vishnu in her dream and was determined to marry him. She went to the Sri Rangam temple in present-day Tamil Nadu, where she merged with the Lord and attained liberation (moksha).
The people who accompanied Andal to Sri Rangam did not attain liberation when she did because they did not have the same level of devotion and devotion as Andal. They may have been visiting the temple for other reasons such as to offer prayers or to perform other rituals.
It is believed that in order to attain liberation, one must have a strong and unwavering devotion to Lord Vishnu and have a deep understanding of the principles of Bhakti. Andal had this devotion and understanding, and her poetry expresses her longing for union with the Lord. Her devotion was so strong that it led her to merge with the Lord and attain liberation.
In summary, the people who accompanied Andal to Sri Rangam did not attain liberation when she did because they did not have the same level of devotion and understanding as Andal. Attaining liberation requires a strong and unwavering devotion to the Lord, which is unique to every individual, and it’s not something that can be attained by being in the same place or accompanying someone else.
Let’s forget ChatGPT, it creates answers based on stored information.
When I typed
It starts with”concept of God”
“Polytheistic religion have multiple God & Goddess for particular domain”
Don’t want to waste Dharma Sandeha space with full answer.
The measure of devotion is so unrealistic & we are easily undermining the devotees.
I feel it is a hardcore insult to devotees when we hastily judge they are not upto to Aandal thAyAr’s level.
Adiyen refuting with this statement
What about NaamAzhwAr Moksham?
Are we going to say Swamy NammAzhWAr was up NOT to the mark until he was on Earth?
10 songs Moksham great bhakthi
30 songs a little lesser
1000+ songs much lesser bhakthi?
Perumalukku pidikkum so avar vechundrundhAr
“Vaitha NAl Varai”
Nee Prahladhan mAdhiri bhakthi seiyala
AndAl mAdhiri bhakthi seiyala
These are unacceptable statements according to adiyen
adiyen believes in moderated AI, which means for eg: let’s assume that all of us take notes from Swami’s upanyasam or let’s say we are able to transcribe all the audio from our Swami’s upanyasams and feed that into AI. Then imagine the output of that knowledge base. That’s what adiyen was imagining when I came across Chat GPT.
Namaskaram to bhagavatas. 🙏
Instead of technology and unwanted discussion, lets move into the discussion.
ஸ்வாமி, ஆண்டாளிடம் கண்ணனை அடைய வேண்டும் என்று இருந்த துடிப்பு மற்ற பெண்களிடம் இல்லை. இருந்திருந்தால், அவர்கள் ஏன் தூங்கிக் கொண்டு இருப்பார்கள் ?
அடியேன் வரவரமுனி ப்ருத்ய தாஸன் 🙏