Namo Namaha

“History is fabricated by the rich or powerful. Rameshwaram & Aadithya Hrudhayam theories looks to be falsified according to research esp. by SriVaishnavas”

 @ Vikraminside – Sorry to say, the above quote is the most ludicrous thing among all the ludicrous things that you have mentioned. In order to satisfy your ego and prove your belief, you have reached a stage to question the very authenticity of our sastras. OK, let me summarize yourself for you. Everything within our sastras that declare Sri Narayana as the parabhramam is true and everything else is fabricated.

Oh! I also would like to convey what one Shaivaite told me. Through many researches conducted by them, they have proven that everything in our sastras that claims Narayana as parabhramam is false. They also claim that Sri Ramanuja himself with the tremendous (political and spiritual) power has falsified many incidents. His travel to kashmir to acquire the original copy of Bhrama sutra also has never happened according to a research. Also, they say, he has interfered in the agamas of Thiru Anathapadmanabha Swamy temple and Puri Sri Jaganadha Swamy temples and has been shunned from those places. They ask why he had interfered with a belief and practice that those people were following.

You also have mentioned that AD is injected in to Sri Ramayana. Then what about “Kousalya Supraja Rama Poova Sandhya….” Sloka. Here Vishvamitra maharishi commands Rama to wake up and perform Poorva Sandhya. Is this sloka also was injected by a sourya. Or, are you going to invent a new meaning for “Poorva Sandhya”. Sri Rama, who completely is aware of his parabhramatvam, has performed Sandhya Vandana. Oh! OK, because Surya bagawan is his ancestor; so he prayed him. They why did Sri Krishna, who is from Chandra Vamsa performed Sandhya Vandana and Rudropasana. There are various verses in Vyasa Bharata about this. The point is, Sri Rama and Sri Krishna preaches us that one should perform the kartavyas of their own upadhi even if he is parabhramam himself. Hence I am at a loss to understand why the present day Sri Vaishnavas refuse to embrace the whole sanatana dharma. On the contrary they are involving in extremely disturbing deeds. (Not accepting or throwing away prasadams of other deities, showing prushtam while sitting, going away from the street if other deities procession comes that way and etc). If we keep on dissecting our sastras in order to satisfy our egos and to prove our beliefs, then our dharma will be no more in few decades. 

“Vishnu is supreme according to Vaishnava puranas, Mahadeva is supreme according to Shiva puranas, Shakti is supreme according to Shakteya puranas and so on” Our sastras says all these and all are compiled by Vyasa bagawan..

I think it is very important to keep our egos aside and try to understand the hrudaya of our veda matha than plunging in to the agnana of questioning our sastras.

A very kind request to Sri Vaishnavas, If you want to follow what your acharyas has said, please do. No problem. But please don’t try to convert people from other sampradayas. Dont get me wrong, according to me, a shaivaite who shows dvesham towards Vishnu is also a moodan. 

Namo Namaha.